for the "Pop Culture Watch" page:
I was just thinking about the different ways we perceive time and thought it might be interesting to post a little of my research here. I find it intriguing that time perception can vary across cultures, and that just by seeing this facet of our daily lives differently, we can begin to lead a different life. Especially when time tends to be something that is seen as static and resistant to subjective criteria [Olympic records, fastest this or that in the world...], but when we really think about time - it is malleable. We perceive time and space differently when we are rushed versus when we are bored, sometimes spaces may seem more cramped or too bright when we are in a hurry. I wonder if this phenomena is the same across cultures [maybe it's an adaptive thing, for protection]? Or do some people really have a more consistent view of time [and is this in relation to their lifestyle/ stresses]? I think being in architecture school has given me a unique perspective on time... in a video I found it talks about how annoyed Americans get when their computer starts slow, how we are a people with very little patience, we can't handle waiting. But being in Architecture and being rushed on a daily basis, I've come to cherish the time it takes my computer to boot-up, or the time it takes to make dinner - these are the activities that define my day and make me remember the things outside of school work that I still belong to. So I thought I'd include that interesting video - it touches on some of these topics [and is pretty graphically captivating] and a Wikipedia article about the perception of time Chronemics.
- Christianna
Phil Zimbardo (speaker in that video above) is perhaps most famous for having conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment; see http://www.prisonexp.org/
The anthropology of time is a huge and fascinating literature, well reviewed by Nancy Munn (one of its most interesting practitioners here: http: www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521
week 2:
I was just thinking about the different ways we perceive time and thought it might be interesting to post a little of my research here. I find it intriguing that time perception can vary across cultures, and that just by seeing this facet of our daily lives differently, we can begin to lead a different life. Especially when time tends to be something that is seen as static and resistant to subjective criteria [Olympic records, fastest this or that in the world...], but when we really think about time - it is malleable. We perceive time and space differently when we are rushed versus when we are bored, sometimes spaces may seem more cramped or too bright when we are in a hurry. I wonder if this phenomena is the same across cultures [maybe it's an adaptive thing, for protection]? Or do some people really have a more consistent view of time [and is this in relation to their lifestyle/ stresses]? I think being in architecture school has given me a unique perspective on time... in a video I found it talks about how annoyed Americans get when their computer starts slow, how we are a people with very little patience, we can't handle waiting. But being in Architecture and being rushed on a daily basis, I've come to cherish the time it takes my computer to boot-up, or the time it takes to make dinner - these are the activities that define my day and make me remember the things outside of school work that I still belong to. So I thought I'd include that interesting video - it touches on some of these topics [and is pretty graphically captivating] and a Wikipedia article about the perception of time Chronemics.
- Christianna
Phil Zimbardo (speaker in that video above) is perhaps most famous for having conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment; see http://www.prisonexp.org/
The anthropology of time is a huge and fascinating literature, well reviewed by Nancy Munn (one of its most interesting practitioners here: http: www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521
week 2:
"Globalization does not spread evenly, and its interactions with, and effects on, local cultures vary substantially." [p 19 - Ch1 Cultural Anthropology] I have a few questions out of curiosity and possibly a misunderstanding of what goes on in fieldwork, inspired by the above quote taken from Barbara Miller's book. First, are there "rules" or regulations about what types of technology can be brought and used in front of the people one is studying? Cameras and/or video must be shocking to some remote civilizations? Another question I have is: what happens when anthropologists who go to a place where there is a very little-known language, and how do they learn to communicate? Also, are there certain communities that are protected from being studied? And what happens to anthropologists if they get sick on the job? Are they obliged to follow the practices of the community in which they reside? And how do anthropologists maintain communication with the outside world while visiting a community?
week 3:
Taken from American Anthropologist by Annette B. Weiner, "Ethnographic Determinism: Samoa and the Margaret Mead Controversy": "Both Malowinski and Mead saw that behavior and values surrounding the most fundamental human relationships they studied in the field differed dramatically from the morals and values of their own societies." [p. 917] It is apparent that different cultures have a variety of ways of adapting to situations, and that traditions also vary widely across the world. But how about emotions? Are there any known societies that do not express, or seem to express certain emotions? Or, even stranger, is there or could there be additional emotions/ feelings that we do not have access to in our daily lives, but that other people have naturally learned to understand?
week 4:
In "The Muslim Woman" article, there is an idea on page 3, "... when these
forms of dress had become so conventional that most women gave little thought
to their meaning".
There is a great quote in the Architecture building that says "Seeing is
forgetting the name of the thing one sees". I feel that this quote could have
great potency in the field of anthropology as a whole, but I am curious as to
whether anyone has studied this concept? Or maybe I'm interested in ideas
about convention? What makes a group of people forget meaning? And how can
they lose a meaning, for something that is so present in their lives [for
instance: clothing, architecture, even words/language today have origins that
we are now oblivious to]? Are there things that we have forgotten globally?
Across many or all cultures?
week 5:
Why has the Western world forgone the idea of community healing when its
affects are recognized by our society as a whole? Often in medical miracle
documentaries there is a comment about the ill person surviving because
someone was "there for them". Why haven't we changed our practices from
healing in private if it is in fact detrimental to the healing process? This
is especially interesting since we consider ourselves an "advanced" culture -
even though we are clearly holding ourselves back.
week 6:
Does the gender flip-flop in the Minangkabau make a difference in the way
these people learn, visualize, construct things, and organize? I have always
been taught females don't have as keen a three-dimensional visual sense as
boys, so does this reverberate in different ways in the things the
Minangkabau produce? Is their aesthetic different - as guided by the females?
An article I found on my own, delves into the cultural values these people
have - most of the mythology revolving around the mother - her struggles,
woes, her importance. I wonder how all of this translates into their material
culture? Does the eye of a female chance the necessities of a given people?
Does it change the way they build? Their techniques and spatial
understanding?